Harmonized product standards for structural precast elements

Where are we heading?

The judgment of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in case C-100/13 of 16 October 2014 [1] has raised serious concerns in all areas of the German construction industry. According to the general interpretation, the court held that no national requirements may be imposed in addition to harmonized European product standards, as is currently the case in Germany with its Bauregelliste B Teil 1 (Construction Products List B, Part 1), among other documents. A comprehensive consultation process is currently underway on the legal implications of this ruling. The Conference of Construction Ministers of...

Related articles:

Issue 02/2016 Current status of the approval concept revision

Implications of the ECJ ruling on the List of Building ­Regulations (Bauregelliste) B

In its judgment of 16 October 2014 (Case C-100/13), the European Court of Justice held that the Federal Republic of Germany had breached its duty stipulated in the Construction Products Directive...

more
Issue 02/2017 How will structural precast components be used in Germany?

Implications of the ECJ judgement

Pursuant to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgment in case C-100/13, additional national requirements for harmonized (CE-marked) construction products are not permissible. The same applies to...

more
Issue 02/2018 Changes for pipes and manholes

Implications of the ECJ judgment

The judgment that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued against Germany on 16 October 2014 will change German construction legislation. To implement the ECJ judgment, the Building Codes of the...

more
Issue 02/2016 Background, interpretation, implications

The ECJ judgment -

A judgment delivered by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) entails a profound change for Germany in the approval of construction products bearing the CE marking: In an ECJ judgment against Germany...

more
Issue 02/2017 Reliability of small wastewater treatment plants in Germany

New technical assessment rules in consequence of the ECJ judgment

In October 2014, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) considered “that the Federal Republic of Germany violated the obligations arising from Directive 89/106/EEC”. Large parts of Part B of the...

more